Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

FPGA SPI transfer timed out

3 posts / 0 new
FPGA SPI transfer timed out

Hi all,
I'm having an issue with the FPGA SPI interface I programmed onto my microzed. The issue is that the interface cannot read the data sent back from my slave device! I'm using a SAMA5d3-xplained devboard, and an oscilloscope to measure signals. I made the SAMA return the same buffer it received, only with every byte shifted. So it's a semi-loopback routine. The oscilloscope captures both the correct signal back from the SAMA (every byte divided by 2), AND the signal going into it (out of the MicroZed). However, the spidev_test.c (that seemingly famous SPI testing utility on the torvalds repository ( program that I'm using shows one of two things:
1. Either the result is always an error of "SPI transfer timed out"
2. or the value in rx is the same as in tx. That is, even though the SAMA slave is demonstrably (via oscilloscope) returning something else, all the RX buffer gets is the same as was sent via the TX buffer. In fact, I can even disconnect the header that plugs the master to the slave, and this behavior becomes no different.
The difference between these two results is simply a matter of removing the 1050th line in drivers/spi/spi.c when building the kernel. It's the call to wait_for_completion_timeout() in the function static int spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_message *msg). What I get from this is basically that the spi-xilinx.c driver does not know where to look for the output from the slave (MISO), and it either waits eternally for that output (if the call to wait_for_completion is left intact) OR it doesn't care to look for the data and just fills the rx buffer with the tx buffer.
Now I have a very limited understanding of hardware and driver programming, so I'm basically like a blind man in the dark here. I'm adding printk() statements to spi-xilinx.c and spi.c everywhere, and checking their results with dmesg and there's just nothing enlightening (I'm using PetaLinux, and the devices all show up correctly in /dev and /sys). I'm hoping someone more experienced can shine a light on what I'm doing wrong here, or at least point me in the right direction.
Attached is my device tree file, plus a screenshot of the hardware design. (the relevant node in the DT is highlighted below)


amba_pl {
#address-cells = <0x1>;
#size-cells = <0x1>;
compatible = "simple-bus";

axi_quad_spi@41e00000 {
bits-per-word = <0x8>;
compatible = "xlnx,xps-spi-2.00.a";
clock-names = "axi_clk", "spi_clk";
clocks = <0x1 0xf>, <0x1 0xf>;
fifo-size = <0x10>;
interrupt-parent = <0x4>;
interrupts = <0x0 0x1d 0x1>;
num-cs = <0x1>;
reg = <0x41e00000 0x10000>;
xlnx,num-ss-bits = <0x1>;
xlnx,spi-mode = <0x0>;

spidev@0 {
compatible = "spidev";
reg = <0x0>;
spi-max-frequency = <0x17d7840>;
I also asked this question here:

(No subject)
For some reason the forums

For some reason the forums aren't allowing me to post the image. But just follow the links to the digilent and xilinx forums and you'll see them!